Racquet images are AI-generated, and all performance stats are estimates based on general opinions gathered from around the internet — not official manufacturer data. How these scores work
| RACQUET ANALYSIS // DATA-BLOCK 43
| STRING PAIRING MATRIX
Pick a string, then slide the tension and lead tape bars below — the stats above update as you go.
| VERDICT // WHO THIS FRAME SUITS
Advanced players who want FX 500 power with a denser, more controlled pattern
Best for advanced players who want FX power on a tighter leash. Testers were repeatedly surprised by the combination — “for a 98-square-inch head size, I was surprised at how much power and spin this racquet supplied” — and found it stable “on offense and defense”. The smaller head and extra mass are what let you keep swinging fully. A good step up if the standard FX 500 started launching once your swing developed.
| PLAYER FEEDBACK // EXCERPTED REVIEWS
Review excerpts are quoted in their original language.
“I really liked the FX 500 Tour on my groundstrokes. I was able to hit all my favorite shots and angles, but with a lot more power and spin.”
“The weight and balance of the FX 500 Tour delivered a fast feel, yet the racquet was just hefty enough for me to hit effectively down the line.”
“For a 98-square-inch head size, I was surprised at how much power and spin this racquet supplied.”
“The FX 500 Tour was stable throughout contact, and I enjoyed how it played on offense and defense.”