Racquet images are AI-generated, and all performance stats are estimates based on general opinions gathered from around the internet — not official manufacturer data. How these scores work
| RACQUET ANALYSIS // DATA-BLOCK 12
| STRING PAIRING MATRIX
Pick a string, then slide the tension and lead tape bars below — the stats above update as you go.
| VERDICT // WHO THIS FRAME SUITS
Players who want easy power without sacrificing spin
Best for club players who want free depth without the harshness that usually accompanies it. Tennisnerd notes that Wilson “made it slightly softer” and added a new braid to the layup while keeping it “a racquet for you who want free depth and extra pop”. Testers found the sweet spot “large, plush and forgiving” with the ball pocketing well, and the sub-320 swingweight fast enough for real topspin. A sensible middle path between a Pure Drive and a Clash.
| PLAYER FEEDBACK // EXCERPTED REVIEWS
Review excerpts are quoted in their original language.
“Wilson has listened to the feedback, made it slightly softer (dropped the stiffness a bit), and added their Forty-Five braid into the layup.”
“This is still a racquet for you who want free depth and extra pop on your shots.”
“I found easy power and depth from the baseline. The feel was very forgiving.”
“The sub-320 swingweight meant I was able to generate tons of racquet head speed for lots of topspin.”
“The sweetspot was large, plush and forgiving, the ball pocketed well in the stringbed.”